Editorial Standards

How We Review AI Tools

Every review on WriteTested follows the same process: research the tool hands-on, evaluate it against real use cases, score across four weighted dimensions, and update as tools change. No sponsored rankings. Scores set before affiliate links. No exceptions.

Research-based reviews
Consistent scoring rubric
0 sponsored reviews
Scores set before affiliate links

The Testing Process

01

Research the tool hands-on

We research each tool through its documentation, pricing, features, and real user feedback, and use trials where possible. This is the foundation of every review.

02

Evaluate against real use cases

We evaluate each tool against real content goals and workflows. We specifically avoid the prompts vendors put in their demo videos — those are designed to make the tool look good.

03

Compare against alternatives

We compare each tool against competing tools at the same price point before finalizing the score, so a verdict always reflects the real alternatives available.

04

Score across four dimensions

Each dimension is scored 0-100, then weighted (see the scoring rubric below). The overall score is the weighted average. Subscores are published so you can weight what matters to you.

05

Set scores before affiliate links

Scores are finalized before any affiliate program is added. Rankings are never influenced by commissions or vendor relationships.

06

Update as tools change

AI tools update constantly. A review from a few months ago may not reflect the current product. We revisit active reviews and update scores when a product meaningfully changes.

Scoring Rubric

Each dimension is scored 0–100. The overall score is the weighted average. Subscores are published on every review.

Output Quality

The actual content produced — coherence, accuracy, tone, originality. Tested against real briefs, not demo prompts.

40%

Feature Depth

Breadth and quality of features: templates, integrations, collaboration tools, API access, and workflow automation.

25%

Ease of Use

Onboarding time, UI clarity, how quickly someone with content experience can produce good output.

20%

Speed

Generation time, API latency, export speed. Measured in real sessions, not isolated benchmarks.

15%

Verdict Labels

Every review ends with one of four verdicts. The label reflects overall value for the right user — not just raw score.

Best in Class

Exceptional across most dimensions. A clear recommendation for the right user.

Worth It

Solid tool with a clear use case. Some trade-offs but delivers real value.

Situational

Good in specific scenarios. Not a blanket recommendation.

Skip It

Does not deliver value at its price point. Better alternatives exist.

Editorial Policies

No sponsored rankings

We don't accept payment to review a tool, to review it positively, or to prioritize it in our review queue. Tools are reviewed based on reader interest and market relevance.

Independent scoring

Reviews are researched, independently scored on a consistent rubric, and never sponsored. Scores are set before any affiliate links are added.

Affiliate transparency

Some links on this site are affiliate links — we earn a commission if you subscribe through them. This does not affect scores, recommendations, or which tools we review. Our scoring is finalized before affiliate programs are added.

Reviews stay current

We revisit active reviews as tools change. If a tool releases a significant update, we update the review. Scores reflect the current version, not a historical snapshot.

Score changes

When a score changes, we update the review with the new score, the reason for the change, and the date. We don't silently overwrite past scores. Change logs are included in the review.

Corrections policy

If we make a factual error, we correct it publicly and note the correction in the review. Contact us at marcus@writetested.com with evidence of the error.

MW

Marcus Webb

Founder & Editorial Lead. Covers AI writing and content tools. Reviews here are independent and research-based.